There are benefits to using M-1 that are irrelevant to climate. For
example the OM6x0 hydraulic lifters often won't be quiet without
synthetics. And I've got better things to do than kill my precious
time changing oil every month or two instead of once per year.

Since there's no extra cost involved (if using extended drain
intervals) there's really no reason NOT to use it. The myths about
engines springing leaks are mostly BS, and in the few cases where that
was an issue, it wasn't a NEW leak... it was an existing leak that
simply increased. M-1 won't make up for your poor maintenance and
relucatance to replaces leaking gaskets & seals. In some rare cases
M-1 has actually slowed or stopped leaks, from the additive package
swelling the seals, but this is not very common. I have no idea what
"operating abnormalities" you are talking about, the vast majority
notice their engines run quieter and smoother with synthetics.

Don't knock it until you've tried it, ok?

-dm

> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:32:09 -0400
> From: andrew strasfogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] Mobil 1 Oil Filter
>
> I don't mean to denigrate anyone's choices regarding the use of M1 but
> I do reject the notion that it is some sort of panacea that makes it
> the lubricant of choice for everyone.  While it may be superior to
> regular oil in its chemical and physical characteristics (which can be
> scientifically proven), for some of us that doesn't matter, based on
> such criteria as where we live 9climatic conditions), our driving
> habits, and how devoted we are to our cars.
> 
> I've also read on the list of issues associated with transitioning an
> engine over to M1 from conventional oil, such as leaks and operating
> abnormalities in the adjustment period.  This, coupled with the added
> expense, is why I am not going to switch my 276 K wagon from Pennzoil
> or Rotella or whatever happens to be on sale (that is MB Approved, of
> course) to M1.  As regards filters, I draw the line and only use Mann,
> Knecht, or Hengst.

Reply via email to