All that was years ago, in reality most people have forgotten all about it Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 28, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Dan Penoff <d...@penoff.com> wrote: > Gary's behavior did not involve stealing from the list members or trading on > someone's (Rusty's) reputation and taking advantage of the list membership in > doing so. > > I agree that his behavior was highly inappropriate, but he didn't steal or > take advantage of list members. > > Totally different situation, and one that I don't see a direct comparison > with. The logic is flawed. > > > On Jul 28, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Fmiser wrote: > >> Huh?? >> >> You want Trent banned for his behavior, but you want Gary to not >> stay banned for his behavior? >> >> If one (Gary) can be re-instated because he gets another chance - >> why should the other (Trent) not? >> >> Buy from Gary if you want. Buy from Trent if you want. But Gary >> had multiple chances to change his behavior - but he didn't. So >> whether he is a great parts supplier or not is immaterial to >> whether or not he is on this email list. >> >> -- Philip, who misses buying from Rusty > > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
