Richard wrote: > The thing I don't get is that this 'mentality' protects the folks who can > afford healthcare insurance ( wealthier ) while shafting the poor... >
The poor cannot be taken to court for non payment, can they? If a poor person files as bankrupt and there are no assets, what can be taken? Bankrupt is supposed to take value from the poor to pay for debt but if there are no assets the debt goes unpaid, hence, perhaps the poor are better off for hospital-care? Bankruptcy cannot leave a person destitute at the street in the gutter, can it? Doesn't bankruptcy allow a person to be left with a modicum of day to day living essentials? Thanks barrister Randy and barrister Grant. mao _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
