The negative effect on Mercedes is pretty foolish... at least in suggesting that Chrysler had their hand at engineering Mercedes.
But Chrysler received a large amount of Mercedes technology in many forms. Interior controls, suspension, transmissions, even entire car platforms (The crossfire was based on the old R170 SLK , which came out around the same time as the R171). Its pretty obvious if you sit in a Chrysler 300, for example. Jaime On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Rick Knoble via Mercedes < [email protected]> wrote: > It seems most are of the opinion that when DBAG bought Chrysler, it had a > negative effect on MB autos. Do you think the reverse is true? Were > Chrysler products improved in the early 2000's because of there association > with Daimler? > > Rick > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner > has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. > -- Jaime Kopchinski http://www.jaimekop.com/ _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
