Andrew, can you support that statement? Can you name even one such person, for example? Has this person (assuming you can name one) obtained comparable government documentation, like an EBT card? The liberals claim there is no voter fraud (without proof). So I'll claim there are no legitimate voters without ID (also without proof).
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of > Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes > Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 3:18 PM > To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Cc: Andrew Strasfogel <astrasfo...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] Subject: Re: Tampa > > A lot of poor folks don't have the ID that is required. > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < > mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > > > Bingo! > > > > Same squawk in IA and other states. > > > > > > > > If voter fraud were not a reliable source of "D" votes, then why are > > the > >> "Ds" busting a gut trying to overturn the new NC law that requires > >> voters to show ID? Face it; you need ID to fly on a plane, drive a > >> car, pick up many meds, buy cigarettes, and even buy a six-pack of > >> beer. The argument that it is too hard (but only certain groups) to > >> get ID is nonsense. These same folks sure don't have any problem > >> getting their SNAP/EBT cards! Have you ever met anyone who lacked an > >> ID and couldn't get one? But if a lie (especially a big one) is > >> repeated often enough ... > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > >>> From: Curly McLain via Mercedes > >>> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 9:53 AM > >>> > >> ... > >> > >>> > >>> There is always at least one contrarian. The other alternative is > >>> that the voter fraud has been, like Chic a gogo, going on for > >>> decades. This is a more believable explanation that "not one person > >>> voted for an R, L, C, S, G or whatever parties were on the ballot." > >>> > >>> The "snopes" article also ignores the bat bros standing guard > >>> outside to > >>> > >> chase > >> > >>> away anyone not voting D. That omission makes the article suspect. > >>> > >> Snopes > >> > >>> has been found to be wrong (or misleading) before. > >>> Deliberate or not? Hard to prove either way. > >>> > >>> Their own article says that 7%, + - the margin of error, should have > >>> voted for R, L or other parties. Just another indication of fraud. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________ > >> http://www.okiebenz.com > >> > >> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > >> > >> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > >> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________ > > http://www.okiebenz.com > > > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > > > > _______________________________________ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
