I agree with Paul on this. Wal-Mart is in the communities because the majority of people want them. If the liberals are so keen on democracy, they should support this. Nobody forces anyone to work at or shop at Wal-Mart. On the other hand, some folks want to force others NOT to shop at Wal-Mart.
The masses may be wrong, but if we believe in democracy they have this right. Otherwise, let us put our cards on the table and admit that we think some sort of benevolent dictatorship (monarchy, oligarchy, communism, etc.) would be best for THESE people (Don't forget to exclude yourself because you think you will be in the ruling class). Just my 2 cents. Tom Potter: American -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of paul Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 8:18 PM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] Walmart vs NAPA auto if that's so (which it's not), the communities obviously complied. it's not just the faceless corporate monolith that is getting it's way...people want those stores in their communities. the other stupid, stupid argument i hear is the low wages they pay their employees. correct me if i'm wrong, but no one is twisting the arms of wal-mart employees. if they wanna make more money, then get a job someplace else. i have, and will continue to buy M1 there with a perfectly clean conscience. p. Mitch Haley wrote: >Zeitgeist wrote: > > >>Try anarcho-libertarian commie pinko, and no, I don't like WalMart for >>a variety of reasons. >> >> > >Does it have anything to do with WalMart asking communities to steal land >from property owners and give it to WalMart to build a new SuperStore on? > > _______________________________________ http://www.striplin.net For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net