There are good Mercedes and bad ones. It really depends on the prior
maintenance. One thing is for sure once a car reaches a critical threshold
of broken stuff it is junk. 

There were a lot of W123 and W126 made, so restoring one is a labor of love
most likely not economically beneficial. I do love the W126 and have a three
of them. One is on the junk scale of things and would cost more in parts to
fix than buying a new one. The other two are my babies and I make an effort
to keep the maintenance up such they do not become junk. However
economically I would say that I would have been better with other cars, but
I place a high value on the ride of the W126. Thus I have a love for the
W126 that compares to my love for beer and tits. 

I would say that unless you have some magical love for the 300D I would buy
a newer car and save the head ache. If you do replace engine, then put a
turbo one in it. 

There is nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes. 

Trampas  

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zoltan Finks
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 5:01 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 1977 300D non turbo engine replacement Cross Roads

You'll probably find more helpful posts than this, but I can tell you that I
just had the engine replaced in a 240D. Engine cost me 900 and the complete
R&R job done by an indy - not me - cost 800 (plus a couple unexpected
expenses). The engine I got usually sells for 1100.

Was it worth it to us? Yes, but as I discover more potentially broken or
breaking things on the car, I begin to question it. I wanted one of these
Mercedes diesels and then I became convinced by reading this list (and got
the general impression that these cars are about as wonderful as tits and
beer) but I'm getting the general impression lately, when I complain about
it becoming a money pit, that there is nothing magic about these cars, they
wear out and break too, it's just that if properly cared for, the diesel
engines can last quite a long time.

Wish you the best with your quest.

Brian
83 240D

On 3/8/06, Tom Scordato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A few questions for the group please
>
> 1.  Can a 1977 123 chassis take/accept an 617.9xx non turbo engine with
> out
> major modifications from the years 1978-1980 to last non turbo year?
>
> 2.  What are the estimated hours to pull out existing 617.9xx engine,
> remove
> things such as alternators, refer compressors, ect. and then put a used
> motor into the car al the while attaching the ancillary stuff I just said
> and install the new engine.  These would be the hours by a professional
> mechanic.
>
> 3.  I assume, new tranny hoses, new lube oil hoses ect. while I am at it.
>
> 4.  If you could share any experience you have.  Is there a link for doing
> this job?
>
> I have located some used engines that have been compression tested and are
> in the 100K miles to 150K mile ranges, some which have been sitting for
> some
> time.
>
> I am at a cross roads on the path of deciding if the car is worth it.  I
> do
> not have the "scope of supply" to do the job myself where I am located in
> life right now.
>
> Thanks in advance Tom Scordato
>
>
>
> _______________________________________
> http://www.striplin.net
> For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
> For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net
>
_______________________________________
http://www.striplin.net
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net


Reply via email to