On 2020-09-19 11:40, Karl Wittnebel via Mercedes wrote:
Yes I take your point on test conditions, but I would like to see the language of that law.
I doubt the Clean Air Act says diddly about what qualifies as meeting standards, that, as well as the standards themselves, is a regulatory matter. The thing about federal regulations is that you can be punished under them just like being punished under a law, but the regs are always interpreted in favor of your accuser who wrote them and gets to change its mind about what they mean whenever it wants, and hold you retroactively responsible for any change.
Sort of like BATF issuing several opinion letters over a period of years saying that a rifle buttstock is not a machine gun, and then the president saying 'it's a machine gun, make it so, I don't care what the law says', and then the BATF saying "We issued new regulations regarding your gun stocks. You have xx days to get rid of them or go to prison for up to 10 years per newly regulated possession, and no, we aren't compensating you for taking your possessions".
_______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
