Sounds right Dan. It can be a condition of carriage.

Dwight Giles Jr.
Wickford RI

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 5:42 PM Dan Penoff via Mercedes <mercedes@okiebenz.com>
wrote:

> Note that I am simply reporting on my observations and not taking sides
> here, nor should responses to this thread go down that road - or else.
>
> With the flights we’ve taken since the beginning of the year, and even
> more so since they put the Federal mandate in place, our experience has
> been that the airlines are employing a “zero tolerance” approach to the
> face mask issue. We’ve seen on two occasions instances of non-compliance.
> In one case the passenger was warned, refused to comply, and then was met
> by a flight crew member (first officer) who was very calm and composed in
> informing the passenger that he (the first officer) would be in violation
> of Federal law if he allowed them to be on the aircraft and not be
> compliant. They were given the choice of complying or leaving the aircraft.
> They chose to stay. Sort of dumb to make a stink, I think, as it just draws
> attention to you.
>
> In the other case the passenger refused to comply. Cabin crew asked them
> to leave the aircraft and they refused. They reconsidered (too late!) when
> the cabin crew returned with a police officer and were escorted off the
> aircraft. At that point the die was cast, so to speak.
>
> Enforcement appears to be consistent across the carriers. This was with
> American and Southwest. I suspect they’re taking the opportunity to clean
> house of “ugly” passengers when the opportunity presents itself.
>
> I believe the term is "Conditions of Carriage”. Buy a ticket and you’ve
> agreed to play by the carrier’s rules. Don’t play nice and all bets are off.
>
> -D
>
>
> > On Apr 26, 2021, at 5:10 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes <
> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oops, that's what I get for reading the headline and commenting before
> getting on real internet and reading the article.
> > I assumed it was for public criticism, not for arguing about/refusing to
> follow the 'rules'.
> > It doesn't matter if you believe the rules are stupid. If those rules
> are a condition of being a customer, do you want to be their customer or
> not? It's your body, your choice. You chose to put it in an environment
> where those rules exist.
> >
> >
> > You shouldn't be surprised if this gets you a 'we don't need your
> business anymore':
> >
> > Last week, a police officer responded to an Alaska Airlines terminal in
> Juneau as state Sen. Lora Reinbold clashed with staffers over mask rules.
> It was a familiar battle for the Republican lawmaker, a vaccine skeptic who
> has blasted flight attendants as “mask bullies” and accused the airline of
> “mask tyranny.”
> >
> > Now, she isn’t welcome on their flights at all. Alaska Airlines this
> weekend banned Reinbold “for her continued refusal to comply with employee
> instruction regarding the current mask policy,” the airline said in a
> statement to The Washington Post.
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > http://www.okiebenz.com
> >
> > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> >
> > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>
_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to