> On Oct 18, 2016, at 09:38, Yuya Nishihara <y...@tcha.org> wrote: > >> After coordinating on irc to figure out what this proposal actually >> is, I've noticed that the semantics of this "exact" proposal are >> exactly what "glob" does today, which means (I think) that >> "files:foo/bar" should be representable as "glob:foo/bar/*" - what am >> I missing? > > Maybe we want a "glob" relative to the repo root?
As far as I can tell, it already is. "relglob:" is relative to your location in the repo according to the docs. _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
