> On Oct 18, 2016, at 09:38, Yuya Nishihara <y...@tcha.org> wrote:
>> After coordinating on irc to figure out what this proposal actually
>> is, I've noticed that the semantics of this "exact" proposal are
>> exactly what "glob" does today, which means (I think) that
>> "files:foo/bar" should be representable as "glob:foo/bar/*" - what am
>> I missing?
> Maybe we want a "glob" relative to the repo root?

As far as I can tell, it already is. "relglob:" is relative to your location in 
the repo according to the docs.
Mercurial-devel mailing list

Reply via email to