durham accepted this revision.
durham added a comment.

  Overall looks good to me.  My one comment is probably not enough to block 
this going in.

INLINE COMMENTS

> uncommit.py:260
> +    prednode = markers[0].prednode()
> +    predctx = unfi[prednode]
> +

Might be worth doing the predecessor check in the lock as well, since the 
result of this verification could technically change between now and when the 
lock is taken.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D821

To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers, durham
Cc: ryanmce, singhsrb, durham, mercurial-devel
_______________________________________________
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel

Reply via email to