pulkit added a subscriber: quark. pulkit added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> durin42 wrote in uncommit.py:247 > undo the _most recent_ amend? or can I run this iteratively and undo many > amends in sequence? Nice catch, it should be undo the _most recent_ amend. Thanks! > durin42 wrote in uncommit.py:265 > Should we also look for unamend_source in the extra, and potentially refuse > to unamend an unamend? Or not? I don't think users will run unamend(1) and then will try to run unamend(2) again to unamend the first unamend. It's not intuitive in my opinion. @durham @quark what do you guys think here? REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D821 To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers, durham Cc: quark, durin42, ryanmce, singhsrb, durham, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
