> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> wrote:
> Sorry, you're right. "hg import" does indeed handle multiple patches > in the same file. > The auctex repo isn't loading for me at the moment so I can't check, > but has anyone modified auctex.texi since you made your changes? That > would be one reason for the patch not applying. Not that I know of. > Also, I noticed that the attachments on your previous email had CRLF > line endings. Have you somehow ended up in a situation where your > patch has one style of line endings but the files you are trying to > apply them to have a different style? I will try to check this. The current problem is not urgent, I exported my recent changes cloned and merged that in, so that solved the problem somehow, I just wanted to know for the future whether I made something fundamental wrong? For me the most important questions are these. - it is not necessary to use rebase. - In my workflow I alwayscreate a bookmark for my changes. When I send a patch, I always have to send the whole branch (bookmark) That is hg export -r 1::3 -o mypatch.patch In my previous example. Is that correct? BTW even if I used named branches instead of bookmarks there is no simple way to export a whole branch? As in in my example hg export --branch uwe -o mypatch.patch Does not exist? Uwe _______________________________________________ Mercurial mailing list Mercurial@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial