> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> wrote:
> Sorry, you're right. "hg import" does indeed handle multiple patches
> in the same file.
> The auctex repo isn't loading for me at the moment so I can't check,
> but has anyone modified auctex.texi since you made your changes? That
> would be one reason for the patch not applying.
Not that I know of.
> Also, I noticed that the attachments on your previous email had CRLF
> line endings. Have you somehow ended up in a situation where your
> patch has one style of line endings but the files you are trying to
> apply them to have a different style?
I will try to check this. The current problem is not urgent, I exported
my recent changes cloned and merged that in, so that solved the problem
somehow, I just wanted to know for the future whether I made something
For me the most important questions are these.
- it is not necessary to use rebase.
- In my workflow I alwayscreate a bookmark for my changes. When I
send a patch, I always have to send the whole branch (bookmark)
That is hg export -r 1::3 -o mypatch.patch
In my previous example. Is that correct?
BTW even if I used named branches instead of bookmarks there is no
simple way to export a whole branch? As in in my example
hg export --branch uwe -o mypatch.patch
Does not exist?
Mercurial mailing list