This looks AWESOME. So I hope to see it soon in MercurialEclipse :). On 1 Dez., 12:09, Brian Wallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Progress is slow, lack of time and lack of documentation for either > eclipse fragments or the zest viewer toolkit doesn't make it easy to > work out how to get stuff working. There aren't a lot of zest examples > either (but then again, I've been fixing an ActiveX control at work, > talk about lack of documentation and decent examples!) > > I have got it building and loading as a fragment now (fragments are > nice way to add an optional bit to an existing plugin). Still working > out layout algorithm(s). I haven't really got one I like yet. The > attached screenshot has been partly manually laid out. The menu has > zoom levels in it (the image is at 75%) and the "Goto > Changeset ..." (need an icon) button scrolls the view with the > selected changeset centered. There will be some other buttons for > other stuff such as selecting a range of changesets to plot, etc. > > The popup menus from the nodes (update to changeset, history, etc..) > are not done yet. I also need to add navigation to the links (each > time you click scrolls you to one end or the other). > > Picture 2.jpg > 34KAnzeigenHerunterladen > > > > On 01/12/2008, at 6:10 AM, Zingo Andersen wrote: > > > > > Yes please give us some sort of teaser :) > > -- > > Zingo "Stefan" Andersen (zingo.org and vectrace.com) > > > Bastian Doetsch wrote: > > >> Hey Brian, > > >> any news on your visualization stuff? I'm longing for > >> screenshots ;-). > > >> Bastian > > >> On 14 Nov., 22:40, Bastian Doetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Hm. Seems like my spamfilter ate the whole thread?! Anyways, sounds > >>> very nice, I'd love to have this as an add-on/fragment :-). > > >>> Bastian > > >>> On 11 Nov., 11:57,BrianWallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>> On 11/11/2008, at 9:06 PM, Zingo Andersen wrote: > > >>>>> Sounds very interesting, looking forward to test it. It's > >>>>> something > >>>>> I dream about in all my version control tools' I > >>>>> kind of like clearcase here that manage to show a "somewhat" nice > >>>>> layout (not perfect i know). > > >>>> Yep. I come from many years of clearcase usage. Sort of like it, > >>>> and > >>>> miss it, but it is *such* a resource hog and I think I prefer the > >>>> changesets and distributed nature of Mercurial. The tools in > >>>> clearcase > >>>> are somewhat more mature (the eclipse plugin on the other hand was > >>>> never much good). > > >>>>> As for packinging I think it is a matter of what the functionalety > >>>>> add compare to how hard it is to "get" the stuff it > >>>>> need's. In this case I think it's a kind of "must have" to view > >>>>> nice > >>>>> graphs of the commits/branches for a version > >>>>> controll sw so why not have the dependacy? the fragment stuff > >>>>> might > >>>>> be interesting... > > >>>> I've had a quick look at the fragment stuff and that sounds like > >>>> the > >>>> way to go. Will be a while yet before I have anything to check in > >>>> though. Do you think I need a new repo or should this go into a > >>>> subdirectory of the existing one? I'll do a subdir for the moment, > >>>> nice to keep it all together. > > >>>> regards, > >>>> brian... > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MercurialEclipse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mercurialeclipse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
