>> But since then others have taken over the "driving force" in the project >> and my ideas with trac seems like and "old stubborn mans last wish". >> If you like bitbucket lets at least consider a switch.
> I don't think Bastian was saying that Trac is bad. Apart from the > issue with non-registered users, the big issue is that reports are > currently broken. As an example, see: No no I don't think anyone implied that trac is bad just that the we have some problem with the combination of the "package" at assembla and I want to say that if people like bitbucket why not switch. > I just twittered with Jesper and he offered to write import support > for our tickets. So let's move our stuff to bitbucket! I'll try to do > the initial work of creating stuff at bitbucket. Everyone who has > repository access right now would have to register at bitbucket. I'd > then grant the necessary commit rights. Really great news Now it seems like the only consern is the "formating" in the wiki. But I think that we probably just can look at other project wiki pages and see if they seems ok we do not use so much fancy stuff some tables and some pictures sums it up rather well. I'd try looking around but I didn't find any project that used the wiki for more that a few text lines can anyone recommend a project with a large wiki? -- Zingo "Stefan" Andersen (zingo.org and vectrace.com) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MercurialEclipse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mercurialeclipse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
