On 1 Mrz., 01:55, Bastian Doetsch <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am 28.02.2009 um 22:10 schrieb ijuma: > > > > > On Feb 28, 8:42 pm, "Zingo Andersen" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> But since then others have taken over the "driving force" in the > >> project > >> and my ideas with trac seems like and "old stubborn mans last wish". > >> If you like bitbucket lets at least consider a switch. > > > I don't think Bastian was saying that Trac is bad. Apart from the > > issue with non-registered users, the big issue is that reports are > > currently broken. As an example, see: > > >http://trac-hg.assembla.com/mercurialeclipse/report/1 > > Yes, the big issue is the broken reports. Trac is okay with me, > although there are a few minor issues (partly due to the hosting at > Assembla). These would be the following, although it would have to be > proven, that another hosting site is better: > > - - Login to Assembla doesn't log you in to Trac. > - - Lots of tickets are filed anonymously so it is hard to contact the > original committer. > - - No integration of the repository with ticketing (e.g. when fixing > tickets). > > Bitbucket *would* have some nice features like ssh, the "social" > thingies and hooks (services/brokers). So I see more potential in > Bitbucket repository-wise. For ticketing I just don't know how well it > works, same goes for the wiki. Another big bonus for bitbucket is > Jespers willingness to help quickly, if something goes awry, while > Assembla support sometimes seems to be non-existent or plainly ignores > problems (e.g. Spam). > > So I guess our first step could be to move tickets to Assembla's > native ticketing and see how we like it. Actually, one could try its > wiki as well - as Zingo stated, our Documentation page is a mess right > now and I'd very much like a clean, accessible wiki / website for the > plug-in. If you've seen the proposed new Mercurial site, you know what > I'd like :). Unfortunately, moving the content over in a well- > structured way might be a lot of work.
just two things you might want to consider: assembla's service does not include mercurial (http://www.assembla.com/ catalog), their ticketing and wiki looks kind of proprietory so an automated conversion to something else might be more difficult than you would like. trac is well known so imports exist. rupert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MercurialEclipse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mercurialeclipse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
