yes..Anshoo is right...

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Anshoo Arora <[email protected]>wrote:

> You can definitely create a Singleton for your Connection Object. If
> you keep it in a Function library, associated with your test, you
> should be able to access it seamlessly as well. I think the scope that
> you have outlined, the Singleton should be automatically persistent
> since its being accessed by a single test, regardless of the number of
> actions it contains. Associated libraries are associated with the
> test, not a single action. Thus, they are available to all Actions by
> default.
>
> Oh, and a Happy [Early] Thanksgiving to all!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> "QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing"
> group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<mercuryqtp%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en
>



-- 
Mallipeddi Sreedhar
215-688-2456

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
"QTP - HP Quick Test Professional - Automated Software Testing"
group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/MercuryQTP?hl=en

Reply via email to