Great. I also noticed this when I was working on a parking lot with internal islands. The relation boundary was almost the same as the parking lot poly. It was difficult to select the parking lot.
Thanks, David. On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Chris Browet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 20:53, Liz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Chris Browet wrote: >> > > That's not the behaviour I'm seeing here. When I uncheck the option in >> > > the view menu, there is no box or highlighting around any relations >> > > until I hover over one or select it (or any of its members). I don't >> > > have lines around any relations I'm not currently interacting with in >> > > some way. >> > >> > That's indeed the intended behaviour. While unchecking the "View >> > Relation" >> > allows a less cluttered workspace, I find it desirable to make the >> > mapper >> > aware he might be editing a feature which is part of a relation by >> > highlighting the parent relations. >> > >> > - Chris - >> > >> I was working on a part of Adelaide, with suburb boundaries, postcode >> boundaries and other relations so that the map is crammed with lines, and >> there are always one or two which are being 'hovered over'. >> Most of the admin boundaries run along roads, and a major intersection can >> belong in many different relations >> eg Glynde Corner -34.8895 138.6565 seems to have 7 associated with it, >> especially as one mapper has been very generous with their use. >> > > I'll make it an option as to whether the relations are "hoverable" when they > are hidden. > > Regards > - Chris - > > _______________________________________________ > Merkaartor mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor > > _______________________________________________ Merkaartor mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
