> > I wonder about that, however. A 286 can't run Prime95, and a 386 would require > a 387, right? > ... or a 486 SX would require a 387 or 487 coprocessor. But since 387s cost buttons, the user might actually have one. The problem is, a 386+387 is still hopelessly slower than a Pentium, even at the same clock speed. Don't you think this discussion has gone on long enough yet? Regards Brian Beesley ________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
- Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Rjpresser
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Paul Derbyshire
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Yvan Dutil
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Yvan Dutil
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Mersenne: 286's and 386's running Prime95 Brian J. Beesley
- Mersenne: 286's and 386's running Prime95 Marc Getty
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents JON STRAYER
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Mikus Grinbergs
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jeff Woods
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Sturle Sunde
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
