>WHY are these others so concerned about a few exponents not being >finished soon? What possible difference does it make to them? It doesn't affect me personally in the slightest, other than wanting to see that line item on the GIMPS home page under "Milestones", that we know M37 is truly M37 and not M38. Part of the reason many of us do this is to see the progress in material ways like that, and I don't want to have to wait until 2003 to see that milestone reached, when it is one computer holding up the chase. That's not the case today (one holdout stopping us) but it won't be too long before it is... ________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Paul Derbyshire
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Yvan Dutil
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Yvan Dutil
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Brian J. Beesley
- Mersenne: 286's and 386's running Prime95 Marc Getty
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents JON STRAYER
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Mikus Grinbergs
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Jeff Woods
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Sturle Sunde
- RE: Mersenne: status of exponents Aaron Blosser
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Sturle Sunde
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents Jud McCranie
- Re: Mersenne: status of exponents John R Pierce
