At 03:56 PM 6/12/99 +0100, Brian J. Beesley wrote:
>
>You might get even more "bangs per buck" by using Celeron 400
>processors, though these will be less quick than PII-400
On Prime95, my C400 is 28% faster than my PII-300, so a Celeron stacks up
pretty well. So if a PII-400 is 33% faster than a PII-300 (which is probably
not quite true) then a C400 is only 4% slower than a PII-400. The actual
difference is probably less than that. Most things I've tested on the C400 vs.
PII-300 are 34-36% faster on the C400.
+----------------------------------------------+
| Jud "program first and think later" McCranie |
+----------------------------------------------+
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
