You also have take into account the fact that the memory bus on C400 is
running at 66 MHz white the same bus on the PII-400 is running at 100 MHz.
This does make a difference on Prime95 since it is also memory intensive.
At 09:09 AM 6/12/1999 , Jud McCranie wrote in flowing prose:
>At 03:56 PM 6/12/99 +0100, Brian J. Beesley wrote:
> >
> >You might get even more "bangs per buck" by using Celeron 400
> >processors, though these will be less quick than PII-400
>
>On Prime95, my C400 is 28% faster than my PII-300, so a Celeron stacks up
>pretty well. So if a PII-400 is 33% faster than a PII-300 (which is probably
>not quite true) then a C400 is only 4% slower than a PII-400. The actual
>difference is probably less than that. Most things I've tested on the
>C400 vs.
>PII-300 are 34-36% faster on the C400.
>
>+----------------------------------------------+
>| Jud "program first and think later" McCranie |
>+----------------------------------------------+
>
>
>________________________________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Terry S. Arnold 2975 B Street San Diego, CA 92102 USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (619) 235-8181 (voice) (619) 235-0016 (fax)
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
