> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jud McCranie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 12:25 PM
> To: John R Pierce
> Cc: Mersenne discussion list
> Subject: Re: Mersenne: Thoughts on Merced / IA-64
> 
> 
> At 09:21 AM 6/17/99 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> >>
> >> You still need floating point numbers and that's probably 
> better handled
> >with
> >> FPU hardware.
> >
> >Do you?
> 
> Yes.  You absolutely need FP numbers, and in all cases that I 
> know of, FP
> numbers are better handled by FP hardware.
> 

You could go with a NTT instead of a FFT. Thus foregoing any double
precision floats. Going with an NTT would also eliminate any precision
problems...

Of course, NTTs right now are a bit slower than FFTs, but who knows maybe w/
MMX instructions you could get a NTT to perform on par with an FFT...

I need to look into that... hmm...

Jeremy
________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm

Reply via email to