"Brian J. Beesley" wrote:
>
> What about constructing a file (/etc/mprime.rc) containing
>
> sleep 1m
> /usr/local/bin/mprime
>
> & invoking it with
>
> 8:2345:respawn:/bin/sh /etc/mprime.rc
>
> in /etc/inittab?
>
I found no performance difference _at all_ between using the one
minute delay and using a direct start. .266/iter on both.
On the other hand after starting X and gimp and then exiting and
killing the mprime process letting it respawn got it down to .260...
I would figure that it is the ReCache effect of using up alot of
memory, releasing it and immediately starting mprime after.
Roughly 2%. Not much but...all the help one can get is appreciated :)
Regards,
Lars
_________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
