On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 06:15:06PM +0200, Lars Lindley wrote:
>I found no performance difference _at all_ between using the one
>minute delay and using a direct start. .266/iter on both.
When I tried the init way a couple of months ago (see the mailing
list traffic from then), I found it to be slower, but only in the
range of a couple 1/1000 seconds. ReCache didn't help much, either.
>On the other hand after starting X and gimp and then exiting and
>killing the mprime process letting it respawn got it down to .260...
Noticing exactly the same. Even worse on Windows -- the P60 (before
getting its power supply burned out) could drop from .864 to .822
just by opening and closing Word 6.0 (40 MB of RAM).
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://members.xoom.com/sneeze/
_________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
