|
Ironic you should mention this, and then
make the most common omission.
From the top, the rules are ...
If year / 100 then leap year
If year / 400 then not leap year
If year / 1000 then leap year
2000 was a Leap Year, as will be 3000 and
4000. Although, as the world's spinning is slowing down, maybe we'll need a
fourth condition at some point in the future ?
Dave
|
- Mersenne: Re: Richard's Y2.1K error !! Dave Mullen
- Mersenne: Re: Richard's Y2.1K error !! Steinar H. Gunderson
