On 7 Mar 2001, at 14:24, George Woltman wrote:

> I've received many other minor suggestions which I dutifully write down and
> implement the easiest and/or most useful.

The P4 optimization is obviously the "biggy". However was there not 
once something about changes being neccessary (to the server as well 
as to the client) to incorporate P-1 factoring as a seperate 
assignment type?

I think we're reaching the point where we may need a new release of 
v20. The point is that we now have fairly extensive overlapping of 
double-checking with first runs which may have been done with v20, in 
which case the double-check job is wasting its time running P-1. 

People running LL tests may also be needlessly repeating the P-1 
factoring stage; a fair percentage of assignments are abandoned & 
recycled with P-1 having been finished and reported to the server.

A quick "kludge" would be to have the client check a local copy of 
the pminus1 database file, even though the user would have to 
download the file & unzip it manually. (Proceed as at present if the 
pminus1 file is missing.)
> 
> >Hey, how about calling it primeXP?

I laughed myself senseless at this obviously tongue-in-cheek 
suggestion!!! Nice one, Robert!
> 
> Several versions ago, I thought about renaming prime95 to prime98.  However,
> the upgrade issues are enormous.  I can just imagine hundreds of users
> running both prime95 and primeXP on their machine - then a flood of email
> questions and hand-holding.

Yeah, don't fix what ain't broke. Defect to linux & forget about 
fashion fads affecting program names ;-) But, if you must change the 
name, go for PriMe. 

> I'm betting this is a rather significant penalty!  You have to use the wall 
> clock
> to time your iterations / minute.  Prime95 will report the same time, but it is
> only measuring the time to do an iteration, not the additional time to write to
> the display.

Still, the CPU time required to write one line to the display is 
considerably less than that required to execute one iteration of an 
LL test on a large exponent.


Regards
Brian Beesley
_________________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ      -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers

Reply via email to