On Fri, 09 Mar 2001 17:27:42 -0500 Jeff Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The point is that we could crank through these laggards if the Primenet > server would have simply ensured they were assigned to a "top 1000" > producer, or to a machine of sufficient calibre and reliability > (historically, per prior test results). Is that what we want - an elitist organization which SEGREGATES those participants to whom we do not attribute "sufficient calibre" ? > > Why not discuss it here? I thought this project was an association of VOLUNTEERS. I believe we should welcome ALL who offer to participate. mikus _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Brian J. Beesley
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Joshua Zelinsky
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Robert van der Peijl
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Henk Stokhorst
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Martijn
- Mersenne: expired exponents Robert van der Peijl
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Brian J. Beesley
- Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Dennis Pope
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Mikus Grinbergs
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Brian J. Beesley
- Re: R: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Jeff Woods
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Mikus Grinbergs
- Mersenne: Re: rat race (was prime95 - v21 progr... George Woltman
- RE: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Martijn Kruithof
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Martijn
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Jeramy Ross
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Steve
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Siegmar Szlavik
- Re: Mersenne: prime95 - v21 progress Brian J. Beesley
