On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 10:00:07PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >which are much shorter than the minimum timeslice (which is >typically of the order of 200 ms).
200ms? Wouldn't this be an error? I can't really imagine that one would typically have only five time slices per second :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ _________________________________________________________________________ Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
