On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 06:42 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > 2010/6/4 Kristian Høgsberg <k...@bitplanet.net>: > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Keith Whitwell <kei...@vmware.com> wrote: > > ... > >> checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so > >> checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate > >> checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes > >> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config > >> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > >> checking for DEMO... configure: error: Package requirements (gl) were > >> not met: > >> > >> No package 'gl' found > >> > >> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > >> installed software in a non-standard prefix. > >> > >> Alternatively, you may set the environment variables DEMO_CFLAGS > >> and DEMO_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. > >> See the pkg-config man page for more details. > > > > configure tries to locate the nvidia gl library using pkg-config, but > > nvidias library doesn't provide a .pc file (as far as I know, I don't > > have it here). I updated the configure script to fallback and try to > > look for GL.h and libGL.so manually when pkg-config fails. If it's > > not in the default location, I think you should be able to run > > configure as > > > > $ ./configure GL_CFLAGS=-I/opt/nvidia/include > > GL_LIBS="-L/opt/nvidia/libs -lGL" > > > > and get it to pick up the libraries from there. > > The other hack obviously being that you create your own gl.pc file for > nvidia and stuff it somewhere in PKG_CONFIG_PATH.
Neither of those sounds particularly appealing... Luckily Kristian has fixed this now and it's compiling fine for me. Keith _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
