On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Bryan Cain <bryanca...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/02/2011 11:27 AM, Brian Paul wrote: >> On 08/01/2011 12:38 PM, Bryan Cain wrote: >>> Since Mesa 7.11 is released now, I figure it's time to discuss merging >>> the glsl-to-tgsi branch to master again. The translator is more mature >>> than last time. There are no regressions that I know of on any driver. >>> The code generation has improved so that it's the same as or better than >>> ir_to_mesa in almost every case. >>> >>> It also will still emit TGSI integer opcodes if you change >>> ctx->GLSLVersion from 120 to 130 in st_extensions.c. Driver developers >>> can use this to implement these opcodes in their drivers, since they >>> will be needed for GLSL 1.30 eventually. >>> >>> Are there any objections to merging it to master now? If there aren't, >>> I'll revise some of the commit messages for correctness and wrap long >>> lines since cgit doesn't do that automatically, then merge it after >>> getting approval. >> >> Sounds OK to me. >> >> I was just skimming over the new stuff - it looks like >> create_color_map_texture() is duplicated in two files and could be >> shared. >> >> -Brian > > Yes, where should the function go and what header should it be declared > in? It appears to me that none of the functions in st_atom_*.c are > declared directly in header files.
How about st_texture.[ch]? That's where st_texture_create() lives. -Brian _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev