On 18 January 2017 at 09:57, Steven Newbury <st...@snewbury.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 20:43 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 08:30 +0000, Steven Newbury wrote > [SNIP] >> > >> > Why not leave in a build time option for whichever is the fastest >> > (non- >> > OpenSSL) external SHA1 implementation but default or fallback to >> > whatever gets pulled into the tree? >> >> Because OpenSSL is not the only implementation used by games, leaving >> this option in just leaves room for future problems. I'm all for >> importing an implementation I just wanted to be sure we make a good >> choice as we will likely be stuck with it for a long time. >> > Okay, fair enough. Pressure needs to be kept on game producers not to > statically link system libraries though. I think that everyone here will agree with you. Esp. since we had similar 'fun' experiences with the C++ runtime, libudev and alike.
Then again, I doubt this [mailing list] is the best medium for that. Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
