On 4 July 2017 at 16:04, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com> wrote: > Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes: > >> So the version is FOOgit-$SHA while the DSO uses, FOOsvn. At the same >> time at least 3.9.0/3.9.1 has broken llvm-config --libnames/libfiles, >> so we cannot rely on that. >> Doesn't seem like LLVM is giving us something robust to work with here. >> >> LLVM users/devs (Rafael), I would suggest up-streaming a patch which >> changes that toggle default value, for now. >> As LLVM does a few releases where it has a reliable way of determining >> the library name users can switch to it. >> >> How does this sound? > > I am not sure I understand why having the hash in the version causes > problems. > Because llvm-config --libnames/libfiles is unreliable ;-( Hence we use llvm-config --version to get the DSO name.
> Can you send an email to llvm-...@lists.llvm.org about it? > It might be better for some LLVM expert to do that, considering I'm the least experienced person in things LLVM in this thread ;-) Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
