Am Freitag, den 25.08.2017, 10:20 +0900 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On 25/08/17 02:38 AM, Gert Wollny wrote:
> >
> > The patch doesn't introduce piglit regression (I tested the shader
> > subset).
>
> I'd recommend testing at least the gpu profile, ideally running on X.
I've done that now running the gpu profile with clean upstream
(f623e1742f) and my patches on top (twice each time). The only
consistent change is fixing
vs-output-array-vec2-index-wr-before-gs
A bit strange is spec/arb_sync/repeate_wait because it is skipped once
with clean upstream but passes otherwise.
spec/nv_conditional_render failed once with my patch applied, but it
doesn't do any register merging and when I run the test from the
command line it always passes (also when explicitly cleaning the shader
cache). I didn't try running it with a clean upstream more then twice
though.
All other changes versus a clean upstream are non-deterministic, i.e.
fail and pass once for each code version.
In detail these are
glx/
- glx_arb_sync_control (all timing-* tests)
- security
initialized-fbo (warn/pass)
initialized-texmemory (warn/pass),
spec/
- arb_tessellation_shader
tcs-input-read-array-interface
tcs-input-read-mat
tcs-input-read-nonconst-interface-builtin
Best,
Gert
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
