On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas <[email protected]> wrote: > It was because on some platforms ./configure test looking for > __atomic_* passes because it's a compile (not link) test, even when > the compiler inserts library calls instead of actual implementation. > It looks like the correct solution is to link against libatomic (which > I was not aware of at that time) and drop these from u_atomic.c (amend > it to 1/2?).
Whoops somehow I misread 1/2 as adding -latomic , so ignore the "amend" part of this comment. It probably came as a result of thinking about bug 102573 and some lack of sleep. > > GraÅžvydas > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Matt Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> Grazvydas, >> >> I noticed that there are some __atomic functions in this file, but I'm >> not sure what they do or why they're necessary. Remind me? >> >> Thanks, >> Matt _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
