On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas <[email protected]> wrote:
> It was because on some platforms ./configure test looking for
> __atomic_* passes because it's a compile (not link) test, even when
> the compiler inserts library calls instead of actual implementation.
> It looks like the correct solution is to link against libatomic (which
> I was not aware of at that time) and drop these from u_atomic.c (amend
> it to 1/2?).

Yes, I think I agree. I really like your weak symbol idea, but I don't
think we can be reasonably sure that we have implemented every
operation we may use -- and we won't find out until distributions
start building Mesa at release time.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to