On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 20:01 +0000, Jon Turney wrote: > On 12/01/2018 17:25, Dylan Baker wrote: > > meson considers classic swrast to be a dri driver, I know it's not exactly > > accurate, but, at least for me, it made the build system easier to reason > > about. > > I think maybe the point here is that '-Ddri-drivers= -Dgallium-drivers= > -Dglx=dri' (or at least, it's autotools equivalent) is a valid > configuration, and gets you a libGL that falls back to indirect, since > no swrast or real DRI driver can be loaded[*]. (Maybe it's even the only > way to get that?)
I mean, it'd be valid to build libGL with -DGLX_DIRECT_RENDERING and just not build any drivers, it'd be able to load the ones you've already built or that came with your OS. But that's probably an even less common thing to attempt than indirect-only. - ajax _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
