Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2018-03-07 20:22:51) > Yes, that is what happened. That said, wrote that patch in September and > you've had about 6 months to look at it. The only particularly active Mesa > contributor who hasn't had access is Ilia.
No, just no. Having a patch in a branch does not count, especially not in a closed branch. I have plenty of patches that have sat in branches for months, years even. You're saying it's okay for me to send them to the list and push them a couple hours later because I wrote them a long time ago? Patches go to the list for review, full stop. The understanding has always been that patches that are neither trivial nor fix a critical bug should be on list at least 24 hours before being pushed, even after receiving a review. Dylan
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
