On 12 March 2018 at 14:20, Andres Gomez <ago...@igalia.com> wrote: > Thanks for opening this thread Emil. > > I will open new branches for other topics that have been boiling in our > minds for a while. I hope you, Emil, can forgive us for not having been > more diligent with those, as you are already aware of some of them ... > 😇 > No worries Andres. I believe that if we're more open about those we'll can be more proficient in addressing them.
> On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 19:34 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: > > [...] > >> A few other ideas that were also came to mind: >> >> - Round robin - where me/Igalia team will check for outstanding >> patches, backports, etc. > > I'm open to this. So far Juan and I have been doing this task while > being on relase duty but maybe it is better to explictly agree among us > (on a specific policy/shift rotation). > If there's an agreement to have a the per-team maintainer, this won't be needed... I think. In the meanwhile, do share how you envision this? >> - Have two distinct emails - an announcement and a second RFC that >> lists the rejected patches and ones with outstanding backports > > I don't think this would be really necessary, specially if we adopt > GitLab. > The idea is what to do, until we adopt it or any other solution. Would the split help people? Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list email@example.com https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev