On 4 June 2018 at 19:29, Dylan Baker <dy...@pnwbakers.com> wrote: > Quoting Daniel Stone (2018-06-04 11:20:45) >> Is git-lfs mainly about supporting large individual files, or large >> collections of relatively small files? The tarballs aren't massive, >> there are just tons of them. If it does seem like a good idea, I'll >> get it set up in our instance. > > It's just for dealing with binary files in general. The advantage is that the > binaries live on a generic file server so you don't have to fetch them if you > don't want them (they show up as a text file with a hash until you fetch > them). > I don't know if it's necessary I've just had good luck with it in the past for > handling binaries.
Yeah, that sounds exactly like what we want then! I'll get it set up during the week. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
