On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:43:44 +0100, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:14:01 +0100, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> > >> > >> Add implementations of the two API functions, > >> Add a new strings to uint mapping for index bindings > >> Add the blending mode validation for SRC1 + SRC_ALPHA_SATURATE > >> Add get for MAX_DUAL_SOURCE_DRAW_BUFFERS > >> > >> The GLSL patch will setup the indices. > > > > Given > > > > The command > > > > void BindFragDataLocation(uint program, uint colorNumber, const char > > * name) > > > > is equivalent to calling BindFragDataLocationIndexed with the same values > > for <program>, <colorNumber> and <name>, and with <index> set to zero. > > > > it seems like you could avoid basically duplicating the existing > > function by calling the new entrypoint. > > I did :-), I have to say git diff has made the worst possible patch > out of the code, > it might be best to apply it and then read the result :)
Oops. It was the changes to GetFragDataLocation/Index I was looking at when I noticed duplication, and then I went and looked up how BFDLI worked and talked about that instead.
pgp8Y7kZkeO1s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
