+Jose & Brian
I'm not personally opposed but I also can't remember the last time I had to
fix the scons build. I think it's been years. Maybe that's because I don't
work on GL anymore? In any case, I don't know that it's really costing us
that much given that basically none of the drivers actually build with it.
But fat meh, I guess.
--Jason
On February 25, 2020 21:56:30 Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
It looks like we have 4 scons build jobs in CI.. I'm not sure how much
that costs us, but I guess those cycles could be put to better use?
So even ignoring the developer-cycles issue (ie. someone making
changes that effects scons build, and has to setup a scons build env
to fix breakage of their MR) I guess there is at least an argument to
remove scons from CI. Whether it is worth keeping a dead build system
after it is removed from CI is an issue that I'm ambivalent about.
BR,
-R
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:42 PM Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsb...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's been a while since Dylan did the work to make meson support
Windows and there's been plenty of time to provide feedback or improve
argue why we still need scons. I haven't seen any such discussion and
I think we've waited long enough.
Let's drop scons for the next release and move things forward?
Kristian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
