I think certain versions of SPEC viewperf rely on NV_vertex_program. See 
http://www.mesa3d.org/viewperf.html

We had some internal hacks to support just the bare minimum of to run some of 
these tests, but they were not accepted on mesa proper. (There is some bug 
report on fdo about it).

Jose

----- Original Message -----
> anholt@eliezer:mesa/src/mesa% loccount *~drivers | tail -n 1
>  251493 total
> anholt@eliezer:mesa/src/mesa% git diff origin/master HEAD --
> *~drivers | diffstat| tail -n 1
>  48 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 2950 deletions(-)
> 
> Over 1% of mesa core!
> 
> I don't know of any consumers.  i965 was the only hardware
> implementation, and
> it was a broken one.  The only app we knew of that might use it (nwn
> 1)
> actually doesn't with the other set of extensions exposed.  While
> removing the
> code, I noticed a couple of other bugs offhand that indicated the
> code was
> poorly tested.
> 
> There may be additional cleanup still in the VBO area related to the
> confusing
> aliasing of generic vertex attribs.  I'm done for the day, though.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to