On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 08:57:27PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 12/05/2014 05:23 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:08:40PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > >> --- > >> Eric was against making this the default when I first suggested a flag. > >> Have opinions changed since then? I rarely use the annotations, and they > >> do make the assembly harder to read, when the assembly is what you're > >> interested in. > >> > >> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_asm_annotation.c | 2 +- > >> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_debug.c | 2 +- > >> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_debug.h | 2 +- > >> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_asm_annotation.c > >> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_asm_annotation.c > >> index 37ad090..ac12655 100644 > >> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_asm_annotation.c > >> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_asm_annotation.c > >> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void annotate(struct brw_context *brw, > >> > >> struct annotation *ann = &annotation->ann[annotation->ann_count++]; > >> ann->offset = offset; > >> - if ((INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_NO_ANNOTATION) == 0) { > >> + if ((INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_ANNOTATION) != 0) { > > > > if (INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_ANNOTATION) > > Doesn't this result in a GCC warning? >
Perhaps I am missing something. Do you mean because there is no, '{'? It should be fine, I think. [snip] _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev