This case wasn't dealing with floats, though. That said I guess it's a pointless discussion. If the compiler doesn't think it's a good idea I'll just add the parentheses just to shut it up...
Roland Am 25.05.2015 um 21:19 schrieb Axel Davy: > If one side is NaN, then > !(x == y) is true, whereas x != y is false > > On 25/05/2015 21:01, Ilia Mirkin wrote : >> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Matt Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's that the compiler thinks that (!x == y) is a typo for !(x == y). >>> I have to say, I think the first does look strange. >> I dunno... the second looks way stranger. x != y seems way more >> natural. While there's no substantially better way to write !x == y. > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.freedesktop.org_mailman_listinfo_mesa-2Ddev&d=BQIGaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=Vjtt0vs_iqoI31UfJxBl7yv9I2FeiaeAYgMTLKRBc_I&m=rqTsSnm2qPfEn8Y0nX8pcSIawnacyg9OIdUGQyiZXxw&s=95kHFb9NIs7yyTx10KUNYT5WZAnyzdOCXz_5ZIaPFTU&e= > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
