On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Ralph Giles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious about the status of the Mesa-is-not-OpenGL issue. I've gotten
> the impression that things are a little more relaxed with the library name
> change, etc.
>
> Specifically, this came up in the context of adding the mga GLX module to
> Debian. Currently there are two conflicting Mesa packages (X and GGI) but
> that doesn't scale. The obvious thing would be to have a "this
> package provides OpenGL" line in each package that provides libGL,
> and have clients just depend on "provides OpenGL".
How about just "the package provides libGL"...it's only words
after all.
Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail)
Raytheon Systems Inc. (817)619-2466 (Fax)
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hti.com
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
_______________________________________________
Mesa-dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.mesa3d.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
