On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:51:56 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Ever since commit bfd5916eafb9a97ad10f1d4a8738e7dcb02e04f4 the
> architecture specific makefile builds (at least linux-x86 and
> linux-cell) are completely broken.  Jose, could you please fix this?
> 
> Since it is becoming obvious that the makefile builds are completely
> unsupported, I have some questions about getting a scons build going for
> linux-cell.  How do I specify 3 different C compilers?  I need one
> compiler to build things that run on the build system, one compiler to
> build things for the target, and one compiler to build things for the
> SPEs on the target.
> 
> Thanks.

I'm sorry for breaking the build. The makefiles are still being supported 
and I've doing my best to not break build, but I don't have  have test 
all the gallium variants. Please read the "Gallium Code Reorganization" 
thread, as I've been posting my plans and summary of all my changes there.

BTW, I actually tried to build linux-cell, but it only went half-way 
trhough, as I'm still struggling to get the hundreds of RPMs of the Cell 
SDK 3 installed on my Debian machine. All google hits suggest using 
alien, but it seems a nightmare that never ends. I'm now trying to use 
rpm2cpio to extract everything to /opt and see if it works. (It would be 
really usefull to have some tarballs, especially since the rpms all 
appear to install into /opt)

Jose


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to