On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:26 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 11:17 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > February 29: Branch 1.4.99.901, no new features > > > > Out of curiosity, which version of mesa is being targeted? I would > > assume master since that's what you've been using in Rawhide. In that > > case, does a mesa release need to be coordinated? I guess this depends > > on DRI2. > > Aah, the Mesa question. I love this part.
me too > > DRI2, unlike pciaccess, is not a complete switchover. Both the DDX and > the DRI driver can implement support for either or both of DRI1 and > DRI2, so it's not blocking the release in the sense of "we can't ship > until this works". > > I believe, though have not tested, that Mesa 7.0.x can be used to build > the GLX support in current xserver, though obviously that won't get you > DRI2 support. I would be thrilled to have a Mesa 7.1 release in time > for xserver 1.5, but I don't know how this aligns with Brian's plans for > the world. Brian made his point , before Mesa 7.1, we need libdrm 3.0 released > > Of course, in my truly ideal world, we would build libGLcore.so from > Mesa, and then you wouldn't need the Mesa source at xserver build time > at all. Why has no one implemented this for me yet? > > - ajax -- Sérgio M. B.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
