On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Kristian Høgsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kristian, > > > > Unfortunately, moving the libGL install target to src/glx breaks all > > the non-glx targets since libGL will never be installed in those > > cases. Is there a particular problem you were trying to solve with > > that? > > I don't it's unreasonable to expect make install in a directory such > as src/glx/x11 to install the library built in there. That's what I > was trying to fix. I guess there's nothing wrong in also installing > libGL from src/mesa/Makefile as well, if something relies on that > behavior.
I fully agree, but the problem is that libGL is created in src/mesa in all cases _except_ GLX. In that case, it jumps out to src/glx/x11 for the build. You can try to make sense of src/mesa/Makefile, but it ain't pretty. :) One way to make this "nicer" would be to split up the install target in src/mesa/Makefile so that it logically follows the build. Also, if you move files around, check the file list in the top-level Makefile that is used for "make tarballs". The equivalent "make dist" for Mesa (Brian probably does this different, but this is how I got it to work) is: $ cd .. $ ln -sf Mesa-7.1pre mesa # mesa is my local clone $ cd mesa $ make tarballs -- Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
