On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:18 +0300, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> The attached patches add support for DragonFly BSD. dragonfly-mesa70.patch 
> is applicable to both 7.0 branch and master, 
> dragonfly-mesa-autoconf.patch just adds autoconf support for master only. 
> 7.0 branch is fully tested, master isn't due to need for too many stuff 
> from git (DRI2).
> 
> configs/dragonfly* files are written using FreeBSD files as templates, 
> differences are mainly various paths and the fact that -pthread is 
> deprecated in DragonFly. AMD64 isn't tested, because DragonFly AMD64 port 
> isn't functional yet (we hope to change it in near future).
> 
> The change in mklib is necesary because 'pkg-config --libs libdrm' returns 
> in my system "-Wl,-R/usr/pkg/lib -L/usr/pkg/lib -ldrm".
> 
> The changes in src/glut/glx/Makefile and src/glw/Makefile are made because 
> without this makedepend complained a lot about missing X11 headers.

I committed all but the static config files to master.  Is there any
reason to have them, if the autoconf build works?  I'm planning on
deleting the FreeBSD ones anyway if nobody complains, as they're useless
at this point as far as I can see (broken, and suck at integrating into
the ports system)

-- 
Eric Anholt                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to